|
|
Post by Risperdal 4mg on May 24, 2008 20:01:09 GMT -6
shekels
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on May 24, 2008 20:04:29 GMT -6
This one costs more than 30 pieces. |
|
|
|
Post by concerned2 on May 25, 2008 7:43:09 GMT -6
Collin's dropped the demand for construction on the BB site.
|
|
|
|
Post by spousestonethrow on May 25, 2008 8:30:44 GMT -6
Collin's dropped the demand for construction on the BB site. I am glad to see that NSFOC is willing to compromise. New ref is all that is needed to make this a fair and just deal. Now the money that has been spent thus far is another issue.  |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on May 25, 2008 8:40:43 GMT -6
Collin's dropped the demand for construction on the BB site. Smart move. |
|
|
|
Post by rural on May 25, 2008 11:25:05 GMT -6
Collin's dropped the demand for construction on the BB site. I am glad to see that NSFOC is willing to compromise. New ref is all that is needed to make this a fair and just deal. Now the money that has been spent thus far is another issue. Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. |
|
|
|
Post by doctorwho on May 25, 2008 11:54:56 GMT -6
I am glad to see that NSFOC is willing to compromise. New ref is all that is needed to make this a fair and just deal. Now the money that has been spent thus far is another issue. Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. And there were concessions made by the SD that we missed ? Hopefully they face the same 'no choice' scenario next week - although they have already stated they'll appeal... ( not quite the same condifence I heard before) -- |
|
|
|
Post by spousestonethrow on May 25, 2008 11:57:30 GMT -6
Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. And there were concessions made by the SD that we missed ? Hopefully they face the same 'no choice' scenario next week - although they have already stated they'll appeal... ( not quite the same condifence I heard before) -- Cannot say this is fact only what I have been told by a pretty good source. Seems that the SB is no longer so confident after Friday proceedings. Guess Scotty did not have the slam dunk feedback they anticipated. I can't see how any side felt this would be a slam dunk! |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on May 25, 2008 12:57:41 GMT -6
Cannot say this is fact only what I have been told by a pretty good source. Seems that the SB is no longer so confident after Friday proceedings. Guess Scotty did not have the slam dunk feedback they anticipated. I can't see how any side felt this would be a slam dunk! Never fear, I have the utmost confidence that if the situation exists where the district loses its case and spends too much money going down the path they have been plowing down even with pending litigation and all of it comes to a grinding stop and can not continue further because they locked up too much money already and no 3rd HS results, they'll manage to spin it such that it's all nsfoc's fault. Perhaps the old saying needs to be updated: There are 3 certainties in life: 1) Death 2) Taxes 3) District Spin |
|
|
|
Post by rural on May 25, 2008 13:36:37 GMT -6
Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. And there were concessions made by the SD that we missed ? Hopefully they face the same 'no choice' scenario next week - although they have already stated they'll appeal... ( not quite the same condifence I heard before) -- I don't believe I stated or even implied that the SD made any concessions. SST was stating that the NSFOC was willing to compromise, and as an observer at the hearing, I completely disagree with that statement. |
|
|
|
Post by steckdad on May 25, 2008 22:10:29 GMT -6
I am glad to see that NSFOC is willing to compromise. New ref is all that is needed to make this a fair and just deal. Now the money that has been spent thus far is another issue. Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. so they were forced to drop it? |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on May 25, 2008 22:34:46 GMT -6
Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. so they were forced to drop it? IMO, only... My smart move reference was the fact that he did indeed amend it rather than keep it in there 'as is' even after a judge says the court lacks the authority to order it. So, 'forced'? No.. but to continue 'properly'.... yes. |
|
|
|
Post by rural on May 25, 2008 23:41:50 GMT -6
Collins dropped nothing. The judge came out and said that he does not have the authority to command the SD to purchase the BB land and build a HS on the site. Collins tried to tap dance around it and finally agreed not to argue the point with the judge. Nothing was "dropped" by the Plaintiffs. No concessions were made. ETA: Collins was not being magnanimous; he didn't have a choice in the matter. He was told by the judge that the Court did not have the ability to grant the relief requested. so they were forced to drop it? They were not forced to do anything. The judge informed Collins he did not have the authority to grant what the Plaintiffs were requesting, and asked Shawn if he agreed. Shawn tried to say that there were ways around that issue, and the judge cut him off at the knees. You could see SC wanted to push the argument further, but realized the judge was not budging on the issue and it's not good form to argue with the Court. So, SC just said that he would not argue with the judge's opinion. I don't believe he is dropping the request, though. I believe it still remains a part of the Complaint. I could be wrong on this, and someone closer to the source may have other information. This is what I gathered from my observations. To be honest, I think the judge was just letting everyone know that he is not even considering the request. It is unobatinable and will not be granted. |
|
