|
|
Post by d204mom on Apr 2, 2009 9:02:21 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA.
Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement.
And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark.
|
|
|
|
Post by JB on Apr 2, 2009 9:39:40 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. I can only infer you are speaking about the $21,638.13 that IPEA contributed in 2001 to the campaigns of Jeanette Clark, Kathi Baldwin, Jessica Johnson, Jim Box, and Jeff B. Davis. That isn't the same Jeff B. Davis who chairs NACPAC, is it? Interesting how someone who ran on a slate now has concerns about others running as a slate. Hello, pot? This is kettle...... |
|
|
|
Post by researching on Apr 2, 2009 10:00:41 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. I can only infer you are speaking about the $21,638.13 that IPEA contributed in 2001 to the campaigns of Jeanette Clark, Kathi Baldwin, Jessica Johnson, Jim Box, and Jeff B. Davis. That isn't the same Jeff B. Davis who chairs NACPAC, is it? Interesting how someone who ran on a slate now has concerns about others running as a slate. Hello, pot? This is kettle...... Why hasn't this been reported? Where is GV on this? Typical.  What I can't figure out is why in the world GV is trying to keep the M2 rule going? |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 2, 2009 10:01:44 GMT -6
Why hasn't this been reported? Where is GV on this? Typical. What I can't figure out is why in the world GV is trying to keep the M2 rule going? Personally, I do no think that is what GV is trying to do.. perhaps he doesn't realize that might be the consequence. . . |
|
|
|
Post by southsidemom on Apr 2, 2009 10:06:18 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark.  Great point. Funny how people like to put a spin on things when convenient. |
|
|
|
Post by southsidemom on Apr 2, 2009 10:07:28 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. I can only infer you are speaking about the $21,638.13 that IPEA contributed in 2001 to the campaigns of Jeanette Clark, Kathi Baldwin, Jessica Johnson, Jim Box, and Jeff B. Davis. That isn't the same Jeff B. Davis who chairs NACPAC, is it? Interesting how someone who ran on a slate now has concerns about others running as a slate. Hello, pot? This is kettle...... C'mon you know this is the district of double standards! Why would you think any differently during the election? |
|
|
|
Post by steckdad on Apr 2, 2009 10:41:39 GMT -6
sashimi...disgusted with the group that gave them a new contract and 4% raise? has it been finalized ? Oh that's right - no one could make that meeting until after the election - and there were no other days available- the HC center was booked solid.. The teachers hear the same game playing rumors the rest of us ' 'conspirators' do... and some 'troops' are out sending stuff around so that the teachers can feel like they robbed their kids piggy banks for that 4% - nice. for the record I think the teachers should get what they can. I would be pro teacher... |
|
|
|
Post by treehugger on Apr 2, 2009 12:26:12 GMT -6
As long as the PTA District 36 Director does nothing but contribute to the electioneering that is going on by PTA leadership in 204, it won't stop. IPPC certainly can't put a stop to it if their leadership turns a deaf ear. There was a time when rules and regulations were respected but not anymore. George is a PTA president now; he should know better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 2, 2009 23:12:37 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. I can only infer you are speaking about the $21,638.13 that IPEA contributed in 2001 to the campaigns of Jeanette Clark, Kathi Baldwin, Jessica Johnson, Jim Box, and Jeff B. Davis. That isn't the same Jeff B. Davis who chairs NACPAC, is it? Interesting how someone who ran on a slate now has concerns about others running as a slate. Hello, pot? This is kettle...... Is this the same guy who (back in the day) suggested the district name the elementary school known today as Peterson as Mark Metzger Elementary? |
|
|
|
Post by doctorwho on Apr 2, 2009 23:18:06 GMT -6
I can only infer you are speaking about the $21,638.13 that IPEA contributed in 2001 to the campaigns of Jeanette Clark, Kathi Baldwin, Jessica Johnson, Jim Box, and Jeff B. Davis. That isn't the same Jeff B. Davis who chairs NACPAC, is it? Interesting how someone who ran on a slate now has concerns about others running as a slate. Hello, pot? This is kettle...... Is this the same guy who (back in the day) suggested the district name the elementary school known today as Peterson as Mark Metzger Elementary? And as head of NACPAC - who do they support now for SB again ? Yup- no connection there at all |
|
|
|
Post by slp on Apr 3, 2009 10:59:07 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. so true! |
|
|
|
Post by researching on Apr 3, 2009 11:08:11 GMT -6
So this organization donated to these candidates because they were endorsed by the IPEA. Here's the thing - every candidate except Janey Wagner sought the endorsement of the IPEA. That's right, Cathy Piehl, Mark Rising, Susan Rasmus, Dawn DeSart, Chris Vickers, Michael Strick - they ALL wanted this endorsement - they ALL interviewed with them seeking the endorsement. And when you get the endorsement, you get the contribution - ask Jeanette Clark. so true! Hypocrisy at it's finest! It's only wrong when it serves to feed the constant fear mongering by the group who wish to stay with the status quo. We all know the ones. They don't care how much we were lied to or manipulated. They don't care that those proven lies just highlight the fact that if our SB / Admin. will lie about some things, what would prevent them from lying about others, like the safety of the MV site? Seriously. Delusional people are the hardest to reason with. |
|
Great point. Funny how people like to put a spin on things when convenient.
