Post by macrockett on Dec 7, 2009 21:53:31 GMT -6
winsome.cnchost.com/MAC/Austerityplanpresentation12-7-09CompatibilityMode.pdf
Here is the pdf presentation by Dave Holm tonight at the board meeting (I did not attend).
Projected FY2011 deficit is $9.2 million.
There is some discussion of the recommedations by the CFAC, nothing stands out on first glance although it looks like one of the recommendations is to delay op and maintenance expenditures 25% and slow down the technology replacement program, neither being a very good idea, especially delay of technology. Nor is delay of new textbook.
They are also calling "staffing efficiencies" , increasing class sizes by one student at middle and high school levels and consolidating classes at high school with low enrollments.
No mention of consolidation here.
One thing i would like to point out that I have mentioned several times, in order of impact on the bottom line.
1) The salaries and benefits area is the gorilla in the room, growing at approximately $7.5 million per year based on current trends. They did mention paring 6 jobs in administration.
2) After than there is plenty of unused capacity in our schools. We still have 1/2 a high school coming on line in February or so, approximately 1500 seats. I don't hear much complaining of overcrowding lately....
3) Then there is all of the stuff mentioned in this attached pdf which will amount to very little relative to the size of the budget.
So there was very little impact mentioned on #1 and little on #2. I just do not see much here that will significantly dent the projected increases of about $7.5 million ever year, year after year....
With out impacting 1 and 2, the referendum will have to be quite large. I suggest everyone start hammering this Board.
Here is the pdf presentation by Dave Holm tonight at the board meeting (I did not attend).
Projected FY2011 deficit is $9.2 million.
There is some discussion of the recommedations by the CFAC, nothing stands out on first glance although it looks like one of the recommendations is to delay op and maintenance expenditures 25% and slow down the technology replacement program, neither being a very good idea, especially delay of technology. Nor is delay of new textbook.
They are also calling "staffing efficiencies" , increasing class sizes by one student at middle and high school levels and consolidating classes at high school with low enrollments.
No mention of consolidation here.
One thing i would like to point out that I have mentioned several times, in order of impact on the bottom line.
1) The salaries and benefits area is the gorilla in the room, growing at approximately $7.5 million per year based on current trends. They did mention paring 6 jobs in administration.
2) After than there is plenty of unused capacity in our schools. We still have 1/2 a high school coming on line in February or so, approximately 1500 seats. I don't hear much complaining of overcrowding lately....
3) Then there is all of the stuff mentioned in this attached pdf which will amount to very little relative to the size of the budget.
So there was very little impact mentioned on #1 and little on #2. I just do not see much here that will significantly dent the projected increases of about $7.5 million ever year, year after year....
With out impacting 1 and 2, the referendum will have to be quite large. I suggest everyone start hammering this Board.