Post by doctorwho on Mar 15, 2008 18:44:31 GMT -6
drdavelasik said:
This is the exact essence of the NSFOC case. The District 204 SB promised the taxpayers "A" in 2006 to pass the referendum and when they screwed up BB the taxpayers got "B". The math is simple - $15M (original BB) + $13M (BB lawsuit) = $28M for a difference of only $3M. Seems we could have just purchased the land afterall once revised amount came back!
GOOD JOB 204SB.
Since ref stated monies to be used for purchase of land for school site.....can that money be used to pay BB for amount they are now seeking? I would hope not!
And let's not discount the fact that we could have already started some of the prelim work before the freeze and saved 6 months of inflation (worth more than $3M easily) -
and the plans were already drawn up -