Disappointment - Cont'd Part3

[Arch]

Continuation again to prevent lost-postings bug

[wvhsparent]

brad204 said:

wvhsparent said:

It goes back further than that.....to the Initial condemantion with the settlement for the 25 acres.

I thought the 25 acres came from the purchase of land for the DEC. Was that obtained through condemantion? Sorry, if this is all repeated history. Maybe we should create a wikipedia page

Yes the SD filed to condemn in '03 hoping to get a ref passed back then. That was the 1st Ref that failed. They then settled with BB for the initial 25 acres claiming they were going to use it for another MS.
That is also where the clause comes from stating that the SD has to 1st offer the 25 BB acres back to BB at the inital price the SD paid for minus fees.

If you have nothing to do for a week or so, peruse the archives, it's all there.

[bob]

To add to WVP,

there was a clause in the 25 acres agreement that allowed the SD to purchase the rest of the 55 acres if they pass the referendum in 05 at that price, the public said no to the referendum.

[Arch]

bob said:

To add to WVP,

there was a clause in the 25 acres agreement that allowed the SD to purchase the rest of the 55 acres if they pass the referendum in 05 at that price, the public said no to the referendum.

Right, that option expired and we filed for condemnation instead.

[bob]

archwinsome said:

bob said:

To add to WVP,

there was a clause in the 25 acres agreement that allowed the SD to purchase the rest of the 55 acres if they pass the referendum in 05 at that price, the public said no to the referendum.

Right, that option expired and we filed for condemnation instead.

Oh, if we could go back in time and re vote 05.

The school would be opening this fall at BB.

Arch, got a flux capacitor?

[Arch]

Flux Capacitor is.....



...fluxing!

[204family]

lol

[fence]

I wanted to revist something that Dr. Who mentioned as a concern in the last thread - it got kind of buried in all the boundary anger. I was just thinking about this issue too the other day:

Are they planning to close WV gold in 2009-2010 at the same time they open MV? If so, what is going to happen to WV at that point, if it's at capacity now with 3 grade levels? How will 4 grade levels fit in that school for 2 years without problems?

MV will be practically empty, NV will have much needed relief, and WV will be completely overstuffed? Is that really the plan?

[slp]

fence said:

I wanted to revist something that Dr. Who mentioned as a concern in the last thread - it got kind of buried in all the boundary anger. I was just thinking about this issue too the other day:

Are they planning to close WV gold in 2009-2010 at the same time they open MV? If so, what is going to happen to WV at that point, if it's at capacity now with 3 grade levels? How will 4 grade levels fit in that school for 2 years without problems?

MV will be practically empty, NV will have much needed relief, and WV will be completely overstuffed? Is that really the plan?

Great point. We need a full understanding of this.

[kmjone]

Been following the threads and had to respond to Casey, back in Part 2. This is my first post. Casey, you really need to get your facts straight before posting. Curt Bradshaw did not move from his Brookdale neighborhood, so your comments about his supposed motivations is unfair to him. You should retract your statement. Also, it doesn't make the Fry community look very good when you post untruths that try to support your own motivations.

[macy]

kmjone said:

Been following the threads and had to respond to Casey, back in Part 2. This is my first post. Casey, you really need to get your facts straight before posting. Curt Bradshaw did not move from his Brookdale neighborhood, so your comments about his supposed motivations is unfair to him. You should retract your statement. Also, it doesn't make the Fry community look very good when you post untruths that try to support your own motivations.

Give me a break!!!! One person from an elementary area posts something you believe to be false and you think it makes an ENTIRE COMMUNITY LOOK BAD?

Pretty broad assumption. Maybe you should retract that statement.

ETA: It doesn't matter to me where Curt Bradshaw lives either. I'll think he'll make a good decision for the entire district regardless of where he lives as he did in the last boundary decision.

[WeBe204]

kmjone said:

Been following the threads and had to respond to Casey, back in Part 2. This is my first post. Casey, you really need to get your facts straight before posting. Curt Bradshaw did not move from his Brookdale neighborhood, so your comments about his supposed motivations is unfair to him. You should retract your statement. Also, it doesn't make the Fry community look very good when you post untruths that try to support your own motivations.

It's a good point of information. However, I would like to point out an individual does not represent and entire area. This is just my opinion but I am tired of FRY or Tall Grass as a location being called out. It's an area not a cult. There are probbaly plnety of people on either side of the debate in these areas.

Sorry, end of rant.. And welcome aboard kmjone

[kmjone]

Let me clarify. It is not me that thinks that of the Fry community. My point is that if a false statement is made by someone identifying themselves from Fry, then it does make the community look bad. It sure doesn't help. Make sure of the facts, then post it. That is my point with Casey, not the Fry community in general.

[Arch]

kmjone said:

Let me clarify. It is not me that thinks that of the Fry community. My point is that if a false statement is made by someone identifying themselves from Fry, then it does make the community look bad. It sure doesn't help. Make sure of the facts, then post it. That is my point with Casey, not the Fry community in general.

If it's not you that thinks that of the Fry community then how can you say that it makes the community look bad. If you are talking of someone else's specific perception, then say so, otherwise it is your perception that they look bad when you first said that it wasn't.

[fence]

Yes, call me crazy but I believe things like this might trump an investigation into whether the TG community is in fact the new axis of evil.

slp said:

fence said:

I wanted to revist something that Dr. Who mentioned as a concern in the last thread - it got kind of buried in all the boundary anger. I was just thinking about this issue too the other day:

Are they planning to close WV gold in 2009-2010 at the same time they open MV? If so, what is going to happen to WV at that point, if it's at capacity now with 3 grade levels? How will 4 grade levels fit in that school for 2 years without problems?

MV will be practically empty, NV will have much needed relief, and WV will be completely overstuffed? Is that really the plan?

Great point. We need a full understanding of this.