|
|
Post by doctorwho on Apr 23, 2008 21:10:58 GMT -6
Reading thru now ( it's a PDF file ) www.nsfoc.org/pdf/NSFOC_2nd_Amended_Complaint.pdfsome interesting additions Violation of Illinois Open Meetings Act ? Not notifying all of it's own board members ? my question would be, if upheld- effect on purchase itself - and now there IS another offer lower in house...hmmmm |
|
|
|
Post by macy on Apr 23, 2008 21:19:19 GMT -6
my impression is WOW!
Interesting stuff on the open meetings act violation. Also, more credibility to the bait and switch argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by rural on Apr 23, 2008 21:37:28 GMT -6
My impression is that they are grasping at straws. The enviro aspect of the case is slipping away and they need something more substantive to beef up the complaint. I must say, the plot thickens.
ETA: Before everyone jumps on me, please note I said "of the case" not "of the site."
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 23, 2008 21:43:57 GMT -6
My impression is that they are grasping at straws. The enviro aspect of the case is slipping away and they need something more substantive to beef up the complaint. I must say, the plot thickens. ETA: Before everyone jumps on me, please note I said "of the case" not "of the site." They need pictures. Real pictures of real accidents and what it does to the human body. Would that beef it up enough? |
|
|
|
Post by fryfox on Apr 23, 2008 22:03:09 GMT -6
My impression is that they are grasping at straws. The enviro aspect of the case is slipping away and they need something more substantive to beef up the complaint. I must say, the plot thickens. ETA: Before everyone jumps on me, please note I said "of the case" not "of the site." I also think the board's hasty actions of the past week have added ammo to the case. From the beginning it's been a case about bait and switch. The enviro issues were/are also important and were a sidebar to the main issue, IMO. |
|
