|
|
Post by Arch on Oct 3, 2007 9:57:33 GMT -6
Have you seen actual evidence from due diligence performed by the SD on alternative sites? If so, please do share with us. It's stored in the same file that says the land in S. Naperville only has issues that would take a mere 60 days to get all corrected. I'd like to see them both. |
|
|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Oct 3, 2007 10:15:36 GMT -6
I was extremely disappointed with the verdict I have not seen any evidence that there is a better or less costly site available that would allow us to open in a timely manner and would be a good location for the short and long-term for district residents. Have you seen actual evidence from due diligence performed by the SD on alternative sites? If so, please do share with us. Howie has it at his house  |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Oct 3, 2007 10:16:53 GMT -6
Have you seen actual evidence from due diligence performed by the SD on alternative sites? If so, please do share with us. Howie has it at his house next to the Christopher Cross signed album. |
|
|
|
Post by macy on Oct 3, 2007 10:18:07 GMT -6
Howie has it at his house next to the Christopher Cross signed album. under the bag of Brach's Circus Peanuts. |
|
|
|
Post by EagleDad on Oct 3, 2007 10:23:40 GMT -6
dpc, besides cracking another joke, I will say that when the paper reports no one has called Paul Lehman, I would consider that evidence of a lack of due diligence.
Daeschner - call Lehman 630-355-1333
Lehman - call Daeschner 630.375.3000
|
|
|
|
Post by harry on Oct 3, 2007 10:36:03 GMT -6
dpc, besides cracking another joke, I will say that when the paper reports no one has called Paul Lehman, I would consider that evidence of a lack of due diligence. Daeschner - call Lehman 630-355-1333 Lehman - call Daeschner 630.375.3000 Hilarious, along with the last 5 threads Has anyone ever gotten an answer to the Plan B question?? I never have.. or Does anyone 'know someone who knows someone' who knows of a Plan B? |
|
|
|
Post by momto4 on Oct 3, 2007 10:36:54 GMT -6
dpc, besides cracking another joke, I will say that when the paper reports no one has called Paul Lehman, I would consider that evidence of a lack of due diligence. Daeschner - call Lehman 630-355-1333 Lehman - call Daeschner 630.375.3000 On the contrary, I thought it made sense to make this sort of call after the SB and admin got together to discuss what to do next. Does anyone know whether or not such a call was made yesterday? |
|
|
|
Post by movingforward on Oct 3, 2007 10:48:05 GMT -6
WOW...The silence in deafening....... Some of us are occasionally away from the computer. I'm all for a third HS ASAP regardless of location. Now I can read through the 5 pages of posts that happened since I last checked in! ditto |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Oct 3, 2007 10:52:36 GMT -6
Hilarious, along with the last 5 threads Has anyone ever gotten an answer to the Plan B question?? I never have.. So we're back from not needing a 3rd HS to needing a 3rd HS, and now its plan B? Or are you asking for plan B to deal with the fact that there's not an overcrowding problem? I'm just trying to keep straight what your stance is. |
|
|
|
Post by harry on Oct 3, 2007 10:55:49 GMT -6
Hilarious, along with the last 5 threads Has anyone ever gotten an answer to the Plan B question?? I never have.. So we're back from not needing a 3rd HS to needing a 3rd HS, and now its plan B? Or are you asking for plan B to deal with the fact that there's not an overcrowding problem? I'm just trying to keep straight what your stance is. We're not back with anything but shedding light on the truth. There is no stance.. Are you being sarcastic??? |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Oct 3, 2007 10:58:00 GMT -6
So we're back from not needing a 3rd HS to needing a 3rd HS, and now its plan B? Or are you asking for plan B to deal with the fact that there's not an overcrowding problem? I'm just trying to keep straight what your stance is. We're not back with anything but shedding light on the truth. There is no stance.. Are you being sarcastic??? No, I'm actually not. I can't seem to find out definitely where you stand. One minute you're asking about plan B and talking about portables and the next time you're saying there is no overcrowding. Which is it? |
|
|
|
Post by harry on Oct 3, 2007 10:59:32 GMT -6
We're not back with anything but shedding light on the truth. There is no stance.. Are you being sarcastic??? No, I'm actually not. I can't seem to find out definitely where you stand. One minute you're asking about plan B and talking about portables and the next time you're saying there is no overcrowding. And?  ? |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Oct 3, 2007 11:04:16 GMT -6
No, I'm actually not. I can't seem to find out definitely where you stand. One minute you're asking about plan B and talking about portables and the next time you're saying there is no overcrowding. And? ? So which is it? You believe there is no overcrowding but we should spend money anyway for a temporary solution that you think is not needed, or there is over crowding but it's temporary and we should spend as little as possible because it will be so short lived that anything permanent will be nothing but a waste of money since it will not be needed long term? Which is it? If not one of the above, then please spell it out. |
|
|
|
Post by dpc on Oct 3, 2007 11:06:00 GMT -6
I was extremely disappointed with the verdict I have not seen any evidence that there is a better or less costly site available that would allow us to open in a timely manner and would be a good location for the short and long-term for district residents. I guess that is where we disagree MT4. You are willing to accept that a lack of evidence means that no other options exist where I believe that it is the SB's responsibility to show us actual evidence that the due diligence was performed and let the public decide what the evidence shows. |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Oct 3, 2007 11:07:25 GMT -6
I was extremely disappointed with the verdict I have not seen any evidence that there is a better or less costly site available that would allow us to open in a timely manner and would be a good location for the short and long-term for district residents. I guess that is where we disagree MT4. You are willing to accept that a lack of evidence means that no other options exist where I believe that it is the SB's responsibility to show us actual evidence that the due diligence was performed and let the public decide what the evidence shows. I might be a wee bit off base, but didn't we elect them to decide the details and the public had their say in the vote process on whether to fund it or not and even WHO got elected? |
|
?