|
|
Post by bob on Nov 8, 2007 18:45:15 GMT -6
Does Patterson walk to NV? It looks like it should.
|
|
|
|
Post by rew on Nov 8, 2007 18:46:40 GMT -6
No Patterson doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by doctorwho on Nov 8, 2007 18:46:52 GMT -6
Would have to re do MS boundaries first - one reason would be Hill MS - Brookdale and Longwood far north -- Cowlishaw and Watts Central district. If MS's redone to reflect areas - would have to see what it came out like What in the world would you do to change Hill? don't have an answer for that - but the fact is that you have two schools near Hill and two very far away - if one was to send entire MS's to a High School - shouldn't they be in the same general vicinity ? I didn't draw the boundary lines for 204 - with a whole section of 203 between us and Hill. |
|
|
|
Post by harry on Nov 8, 2007 18:47:45 GMT -6
What in the world would you do to change Hill? Hill is overcrowded right now with more coming. Someone has to leave. Not sure if a whole ES has to leave. Wow, I didn't know that hill is any more overcrowded than other schools,, why are their not portables to help with this problem?? |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Nov 8, 2007 18:52:30 GMT -6
That doesn't make sense. They are clearly under 1.5 miles from NV. |
|
|
|
Post by proschool on Nov 8, 2007 18:54:53 GMT -6
What in the world would you do to change Hill? Hill is overcrowded right now with more coming. Someone has to leave. Not sure if a whole ES has to leave. Only half of Cowlishaw goes to Hill. I did not know that anyone was leaving Hill. I still think it is easier to start with middle schools. You can rearrange the middle schools next. It would be easier to decide who comes out of Hill when the HS questions have been answered. |
|
|
|
Post by harry on Nov 8, 2007 18:57:46 GMT -6
Hill is overcrowded right now with more coming. Someone has to leave. Not sure if a whole ES has to leave. Only half of Cowlishaw goes to Hill. I did not know that anyone was leaving Hill. I still think it is easier to start with middle schools. You can rearrange the middle schools next. It would be easier to decide who comes out of Hill when the HS questions have been answered. Agreed It is also easier on children to make the 'switch' in middle school so that they have established relationships going into hs |
|
|
|
Post by momof3 on Nov 8, 2007 18:59:04 GMT -6
bob is this MM quote why you think the Bolingbrook site is in the running? That development that Claar was dead set on for that land is a disaster. No streets in on that property yet. Yes. I think Claar is in a bit of trouble with his town funded housing development failing. The site report makes a point to specifically mention 2 unwilling negotiators - AME and Bolingbrook. Didn't MM write the site selection? Then he makes it a point to talk about 2 unwilling negotiators in the article. Could be sheer coincidence. Anything is possible at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by rew on Nov 8, 2007 18:59:05 GMT -6
Bob, there may be some walkers in Ashbury, but check out the bus routes for NVHS on the IPSD website. There are buses picking up kids in Ashbury
There are buses from Clow, there are buses from Welch.
|
|
|
|
Post by harry on Nov 8, 2007 19:03:13 GMT -6
Yes. I think Claar is in a bit of trouble with his town funded housing development failing. The site report makes a point to specifically mention 2 unwilling negotiators - AME and Bolingbrook. Didn't MM write the site selection? Then he makes it a point to talk about 2 unwilling negotiators in the article. Could be sheer coincidence. Anything is possible at this point. How do we know that they aren't willing negotiators now?? |
|
|
|
Post by momof3 on Nov 8, 2007 19:04:22 GMT -6
I posted this link in one of my replies - but for reference or bedtime reading... This is the site selection report MM is talking about in the interview www.ipsd.org/documents/204LandWP.pdf |
|
|
|
Post by momof3 on Nov 8, 2007 19:05:29 GMT -6
The site report makes a point to specifically mention 2 unwilling negotiators - AME and Bolingbrook. Didn't MM write the site selection? Then he makes it a point to talk about 2 unwilling negotiators in the article. Could be sheer coincidence. Anything is possible at this point. How do we know that they aren't willing negotiators now?? That's my point. I think they very well could be. Site selection report says AME and Bolingbrook are unwilling. Now suddenly 2 "formerly unwilling" are willing. Do the math. ETA - However, I would count BB as "formerly unwilling" too, but I think it's fairly clear from the interview that BB is out. |
|
|
|
Post by proschool on Nov 8, 2007 19:07:09 GMT -6
The other could be Macom. MM said that the seller was not negotiating before but he did not say before what. At one point Macom was not negotiating.
You have to watch those lawyers.
|
|
|
|
Post by momof3 on Nov 8, 2007 19:09:08 GMT -6
The other could be Macom. MM said that the seller was not negotiating before but he did not say before what. At one point Macom was not negotiating. You have to watch those lawyers. Point taken  The site report seems to imply that they didn't even try. |
|
|
|
Post by harry on Nov 8, 2007 19:16:24 GMT -6
The other could be Macom. MM said that the seller was not negotiating before but he did not say before what. At one point Macom was not negotiating. You have to watch those lawyers. Point taken The site report seems to imply that they didn't even try. of course they didn't they, the Sb, acted like a petulant child "I want BB when I want it and I want it now" We old folks know what happened to the spoiled brat Veruca Salt in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.. a bad egg now they are faced with adult decisions and they continue to act like brats |
|
