|
Post by sushi on Mar 8, 2008 10:50:03 GMT -6
Clearly, the NSFOC people did not think this through. As stated, they want to punch the SB in the face, legally. They could give a c**p about the rest of it.
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Mar 8, 2008 10:56:24 GMT -6
Okay, I was half joking/half serious about the terrorist thing. Truly, look at this situation. A group that does not represent me has filed a suit essentially hijacking our school district and taking the 3rd HS hostage--and we all know what happens to the hostage. NSFOC is not trying to "slow things down," that's absolutely bogus! They don't want accounability, they want to derail the whole project. I believe some members are being altrusitic. But by filing this lawsuit, this GROUP is saying BB or no 3rd HS: that's what NSFOC wants. If you are a member of this group, you will have to accept that this is how you will be viewed. That's what it truly boils down to. BB or nothing. We are certainly being held hostage. It's a dangerous game that people are playing with this. No way a 3rd ref gets passed in this economy. So, even though the CFO people and the boundary people have found a common enemy, if nsfoc wins, the boundary people and all the others lose. Only CFO wins. Is this what we want? If you only focus on winning, then one tends to overlook facts that may work contrary to that intended outcome. Let the facts drive the conclusion, not the other way around.
|
|
|
Post by sushi on Mar 8, 2008 11:50:47 GMT -6
On the other board, WP re-named the organization ONSFOC for "Overcrowded neighborhood schools for our children". It is easier to remember the name because this acronym is actually telling. Just add an "ed" on the end, one being collective.
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Mar 8, 2008 12:08:45 GMT -6
On the other board, WP re-named the organization ONSFOC for "Overcrowded neighborhood schools for our children". It is easier to remember the name because this acronym is actually telling. Just add an "ed" on the end, one being collective. ONSFOC'd? The first O is strong. ;D
|
|
|
Post by mandmmom on Mar 8, 2008 23:13:20 GMT -6
No, the SB didn't get us into this. A small group of short-sighted people who are upset they didn't get their own way did this. My 3 year old does this all the time - you aren't playing my way so I am going to take all my toys and play all by myself. She get's a time out. There's much worse I'd like to do to NSFOC. Idiots. (Go ahead ban me.) There is no question, selfish, self-centered people. I don't see what could be negotiated. We can't afford BB. This will either go away quickly or we'll be squished into two mega-schools. [/quote] You nailed it...selfish, self-centered people are.....OUR SCHOOL BOARD
|
|