Post by asmodeus on Jul 30, 2010 13:47:37 GMT -6
On June 15, I parked at the Route 59 Metra lot and went to pay the $2 daily fee at one of the machines. In an all too frequent occurrence, the machine rejected one of my dollars and with the train already loading, I had a decision -- fiddle with the machine and miss the train, or take my chances that the meter maid would not give me a ticket. I chose the latter.
Sure enough, when I returned to my car after work, there was a $20 ticket on the windshield. I momentarily grimaced at the fine amount -- especially considering I did leave one dollar in the machine that morning -- but chalked it up as just one of life's annoyances.
Two weeks later I got around to sending a check in to pay the ticket, and the check was cashed on 7/6. However, just after I mailed the check I received a notice stating that the payment had been due 6/25 (just 10 days after the citation) and that the penalty was now $40. I refused to pay an additonal $20 so I threw the letter away. A couple of weeks later, I received notice that the fine was now $80 and would be $120 if I didn't pay by July 30. Holy crap! Talk about inflation. I decided that I would go to the hearing on July 30 and give them a piece of my mind.
So today I took the day off from work and traveled to City Hall (Aurora) to have my day in court. Sitting in the council chambers, I watched as several people argued their parking tickets and surprisingly were found not liable by the hearing officer, despite what I considered to be irrelevant excuses. One guy successfully fought a ticket for parking in a No Parking zone. Another guy said he shouldn't have to pay for an expired meter because his friend in a nearby storefront noticed that the meter maid was waiting at his car minutes before it expired--as if that changed the fact the meter did expire.
I figured I had a good chance at success based on this apparent leniency, but when it was my turn the hearing officer decided to get tough.
I explained that I wasn't contesting the original ticket, but rather the outrageous escalation in fines. The check cleared 20 days after the infraction--why should I be paying $80 for this? The hearing officer first told me he wasn't even allowed to rule on such a case but then basically went on to defend the quadrupling of the penalty. By then I knew I was toast so I gave my two cents about how this is one of the reasons people don't trust government. For a piddly little offense, the government can confiscate huge amounts relative to the original fine.
Anyway, I paid the additional $60 and left the building. I noticed that Hollywood Casino was just a few hundred feet away, and decided to test the Karma waters...
Now I've done some gambling in my day, with annual trips to Vegas where the rooms and meals for me and my buddies were always "comped" thanks to the level of gambling we would exhibit. However, I haven't been back in years because I came to the realization that you just can't win over the long haul and each trip was costing me $5k even with all my other expenses paid.
So on a whim, I decided to go into Hollywood Casino and play one hand of Blackjack for $60. Either I would win back the parking fine, or I'd be out another $60. I walked to the first table I could find, plopped down three $20 bills and sat down next to two other guys. The dealer gave me $60 in chips and I put them all down on one hand. Here were my cards:
8, 2
The dealer had a 6. If you've played Blackjack, you know this is a great hand for the player. The odds are that the dealer will bust, and with a two-card total of 10, the proper play is to "double down". Of course, that meant digging into my wallet for another $60, which now meant I was risking $120. You can probably guess what came next. The dealer gave me a 4, giving me 14 total. He then drew for himself a 3 and a 10, giving him 19 and the win.
I calmly walked out with a chuckle, and thought about how even when things seem certain to go your way, life doesn't always comply.
Sure enough, when I returned to my car after work, there was a $20 ticket on the windshield. I momentarily grimaced at the fine amount -- especially considering I did leave one dollar in the machine that morning -- but chalked it up as just one of life's annoyances.
Two weeks later I got around to sending a check in to pay the ticket, and the check was cashed on 7/6. However, just after I mailed the check I received a notice stating that the payment had been due 6/25 (just 10 days after the citation) and that the penalty was now $40. I refused to pay an additonal $20 so I threw the letter away. A couple of weeks later, I received notice that the fine was now $80 and would be $120 if I didn't pay by July 30. Holy crap! Talk about inflation. I decided that I would go to the hearing on July 30 and give them a piece of my mind.
So today I took the day off from work and traveled to City Hall (Aurora) to have my day in court. Sitting in the council chambers, I watched as several people argued their parking tickets and surprisingly were found not liable by the hearing officer, despite what I considered to be irrelevant excuses. One guy successfully fought a ticket for parking in a No Parking zone. Another guy said he shouldn't have to pay for an expired meter because his friend in a nearby storefront noticed that the meter maid was waiting at his car minutes before it expired--as if that changed the fact the meter did expire.
I figured I had a good chance at success based on this apparent leniency, but when it was my turn the hearing officer decided to get tough.
I explained that I wasn't contesting the original ticket, but rather the outrageous escalation in fines. The check cleared 20 days after the infraction--why should I be paying $80 for this? The hearing officer first told me he wasn't even allowed to rule on such a case but then basically went on to defend the quadrupling of the penalty. By then I knew I was toast so I gave my two cents about how this is one of the reasons people don't trust government. For a piddly little offense, the government can confiscate huge amounts relative to the original fine.
Anyway, I paid the additional $60 and left the building. I noticed that Hollywood Casino was just a few hundred feet away, and decided to test the Karma waters...
Now I've done some gambling in my day, with annual trips to Vegas where the rooms and meals for me and my buddies were always "comped" thanks to the level of gambling we would exhibit. However, I haven't been back in years because I came to the realization that you just can't win over the long haul and each trip was costing me $5k even with all my other expenses paid.
So on a whim, I decided to go into Hollywood Casino and play one hand of Blackjack for $60. Either I would win back the parking fine, or I'd be out another $60. I walked to the first table I could find, plopped down three $20 bills and sat down next to two other guys. The dealer gave me $60 in chips and I put them all down on one hand. Here were my cards:
8, 2
The dealer had a 6. If you've played Blackjack, you know this is a great hand for the player. The odds are that the dealer will bust, and with a two-card total of 10, the proper play is to "double down". Of course, that meant digging into my wallet for another $60, which now meant I was risking $120. You can probably guess what came next. The dealer gave me a 4, giving me 14 total. He then drew for himself a 3 and a 10, giving him 19 and the win.
I calmly walked out with a chuckle, and thought about how even when things seem certain to go your way, life doesn't always comply.