|
Post by sleeplessinnpvl on Mar 12, 2008 10:08:56 GMT -6
I think its anonymous for the same reasons that I don't see any names on the other site as well. And for the same reasons we don't use our real names on these boards.
|
|
|
Post by gman413 on Mar 12, 2008 10:09:04 GMT -6
How is www.nsfoc.org any less anonymous ? I didn't see where on the site or in the registry info anyone is ID'd??
|
|
|
Post by researching on Mar 12, 2008 10:13:35 GMT -6
How is www.nsfoc.org any less anonymous ? I didn't see where on the site or in the registry info anyone is ID'd?? To be fair, NSFOC has a spokesperson. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone has stepped up for that site. Who is the spokesperson for nsfocfraud?
|
|
|
Post by gman413 on Mar 12, 2008 10:25:35 GMT -6
How is www.nsfoc.org any less anonymous ? I didn't see where on the site or in the registry info anyone is ID'd?? To be fair, NSFOC has a spokesperson. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone has stepped up for that site. Who is the spokesperson for nsfocfraud? Fair enough - the earlier post and reply though were re: the websites
|
|
|
Post by sleeplessinnpvl on Mar 12, 2008 10:25:49 GMT -6
How is www.nsfoc.org any less anonymous ? I didn't see where on the site or in the registry info anyone is ID'd?? To be fair, NSFOC has a spokesperson. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone has stepped up for that site. Who is the spokesperson for nsfocfraud? Mr. Andrews had to make himself visible as he was speaking at a meeting. I don't believe the members of the other group are planning to hold meetings or file lawsuits. I'm not sure, but there doesn't appear to be anything on their site to that effect. But if they do, I'm sure they will become visible as well.
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Mar 12, 2008 10:32:11 GMT -6
To be fair, NSFOC has a spokesperson. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone has stepped up for that site. Who is the spokesperson for nsfocfraud? Mr. Andrews had to make himself visible as he was speaking at a meeting. I don't believe the members of the other group are planning to hold meetings or file lawsuits. I'm not sure, but there doesn't appear to be anything on their site to that effect. But if they do, I'm sure they will become visible as well. So, we know there is at least 1 person in the opposition group, since that is all it takes to put up a website, right?
|
|
|
Post by sleeplessinnpvl on Mar 12, 2008 10:38:17 GMT -6
Mr. Andrews had to make himself visible as he was speaking at a meeting. I don't believe the members of the other group are planning to hold meetings or file lawsuits. I'm not sure, but there doesn't appear to be anything on their site to that effect. But if they do, I'm sure they will become visible as well. So, we know there is at least 1 person in the opposition group, since that is all it takes to put up a website, right? Correct. Just like we know there is Mr. Andrews on the other side. OK, there are a few more since money was flying everywhere!
|
|
|
Post by twhl on Mar 12, 2008 12:22:27 GMT -6
To be fair, NSFOC has a spokesperson. Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone has stepped up for that site. Who is the spokesperson for nsfocfraud? Mr. Andrews had to make himself visible as he was speaking at a meeting. I don't believe the members of the other group are planning to hold meetings or file lawsuits. I'm not sure, but there doesn't appear to be anything on their site to that effect. But if they do, I'm sure they will become visible as well. Same old stuff, "bash and suppress, bash and suppress, bash and suppress" anyone who questions decisions, directions, withholding of information, from self proclaimed non experts for hazardous sites with a major construction project. Beautiful !!!
|
|