|
|
Post by JB on Apr 11, 2008 6:24:59 GMT -6
Whether we agree or disagree- she has never wavered from her stance that we do not need a 3rd high school. You're right and I have always given her credit for sticking by her plan. She has been the most fair and impartial SB member. She'll get my vote but I'd do anything possible to kick every other one of them out! My outlook on her has changed. While I probably won't always agree with her, I do respect the fact that she stood up for what she believed in. |
|
|
|
Post by sushi on Apr 11, 2008 6:58:09 GMT -6
Oh please! She is an idiot who needs 3x5's to ask a question or give an opinion. She is nothing more than a puppet for the no-tax organization (whose name escapes me).
I can't believe anyone would start the "we don't need a third HS argument" again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 11, 2008 7:00:28 GMT -6
Oh please! She is an idiot who needs 3x5's to ask a question or give an opinion. She is nothing more than a puppet for the no-tax organization (whose name escapes me). I can't believe anyone would start the "we don't need a third HS argument" again. If she's an idiot for asking questions, what does that make those up there that didn't? |
|
|
|
Post by rural on Apr 11, 2008 7:00:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 11, 2008 7:03:03 GMT -6
HA HA HA Was it over when the... School Board condemned Wagner farms?!?! |
|
|
|
Post by slp on Apr 11, 2008 7:04:42 GMT -6
why do I fear this may mean the sb is moving forward with the Eola site by purchasing more of the AME land? I think that is dangerous ; putting a high school next to an unremediated site. |
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 11, 2008 7:09:10 GMT -6
why do I fear this may mean the sb is moving forward with the Eola site by purchasing more of the AME land? I think that is dangerous ; putting a high school next to an unremediated site. I believe that move would be the nail in the coffin for the 3rd HS ever coming to fruition. If they seriously want to torpedo the prospect of ever having one, that would certainly do it. |
|
|
|
Post by rural on Apr 11, 2008 7:09:18 GMT -6
why do I fear this may mean the sb is moving forward with the Eola site by purchasing more of the AME land? I think that is dangerous ; putting a high school next to an unremediated site. Relax, this was only put out there for fun. I know nothing more than anyone else. Have some fun. If I don't, I'll just end up puking all day.  |
|
|
|
Post by slp on Apr 11, 2008 7:10:52 GMT -6
why do I fear this may mean the sb is moving forward with the Eola site by purchasing more of the AME land? I think that is dangerous ; putting a high school next to an unremediated site. Relax, this was only put out there for fun. I know nothing more than anyone else. Have some fun. If I don't, I'll just end up puking all day. very true. I so love animal house ! I just got a little crazy ! sorry! eta: but I do agree with Arch.... putting the school next to questionable land without remediation and without knowledge of future plans for that land is not any better than putting the high school on that land itself! I guess we need to re-evaluate the entire situation since years have transpired since the original inception of this plan. I am NOT saying no need for a 3rd highschool, I still believe we need one, BUT perhaps we need to think outside the box for a solution to benefit our kids while not jeopardizing their safety and doing what the majority of taxpayers would want. (if that means another vote, so be it) |
|
|
|
Post by rural on Apr 11, 2008 7:16:07 GMT -6
At this point the ball is in the SD's court and it's a waiting game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arch on Apr 11, 2008 7:21:49 GMT -6
At this point the ball is in the SD's court and it's a waiting game. Yup... I hope they take their time to think, then act rather than just react. |
|
|
|
Post by snerdley on Apr 11, 2008 7:27:33 GMT -6
why do I fear this may mean the sb is moving forward with the Eola site by purchasing more of the AME land? I think that is dangerous ; putting a high school next to an unremediated site. Relax, this was only put out there for fun. I know nothing more than anyone else. Have some fun. If I don't, I'll just end up puking all day. I wonder if this was put out there so the pro-Eola side would simmer down? The last thing the SB wants is for their "supporters" whom they have praised, to go on a spray-painting rampage. |
|
|
|
Post by rew on Apr 11, 2008 7:27:53 GMT -6
No, I will not support any current member for re election... not in 2009 and not in 2011. They have all lacked leadership and sound judgment through this mess. I hope there are some reasonable candidates willing to run.
I will be very cautious of all my votes from now on, especially local elections.
|
|
|
|
Post by rural on Apr 11, 2008 7:29:25 GMT -6
Snerdley, grow up.  |
|
|
|
Post by rew on Apr 11, 2008 7:32:07 GMT -6
Rural, when you say you would like to see the school built at AME, do you mean condemn the rest of the church property, or try to put a school on the 49 acres?
|
|
