|
|
Post by gatormom on Jan 19, 2007 20:32:17 GMT -6
Welcome Back Eagle - Going to answer my question? BC if your question was why did it take til Jan for the offer to become known...That is what we all would love to know. The SB is not saying. Most of us are peeved about that too. I hope I am not assuming too much for the group.... I am still not sure on that one. They are in the middle of the court stuff with BB. I don't know how much that factored into the decision to not go public. |
|
|
|
Post by blankcheck on Jan 19, 2007 20:33:24 GMT -6
Pro- please, I'm trying to figure this out. Your sarcasm does little to help.
|
|
|
|
Post by EagleDad on Jan 19, 2007 20:34:17 GMT -6
So, why did they not donate this time around? Since you were so involved in the process? Macom was mad at their development being put in the WVHS boundary. That is the only thing that changed between 05 and 06. That would actually be news to me. Truly, I don't know why they didn't contibute. But after giving 10K the year before when a different (much less info) referendum didn't pass, I can understand. |
|
|
|
Post by blankcheck on Jan 19, 2007 20:35:46 GMT -6
That's the best you can come up with? Because the last one did not pass? Give me a break.
Something came down between Macom and the SB.
|
|
|
|
Post by bob on Jan 19, 2007 20:36:12 GMT -6
That is my speculation not fact.
Blank in my opinion it is because Ashbury was put in WVHS .
|
|
|
|
Post by EagleDad on Jan 19, 2007 20:36:17 GMT -6
I'll bet that was a heated meeting between Macom and the SB. Sorry-something is just not right here - not sure what it is. For all these years you have developers and builder donating to campaigns then poof their gone? You may be confusing the SB with the PAC (204theKids). They are very different and not connected at all. |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Jan 19, 2007 20:38:13 GMT -6
BC, you seem to write that 204TK and the SB are one in the same but they are not.
|
|
|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Jan 19, 2007 20:38:19 GMT -6
Pro and Blank....please behave....thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by blankcheck on Jan 19, 2007 20:38:22 GMT -6
OK-whatever-PAC,SB the question still remains. Why would they pull their donation this time around when they have been so supportive in past referendums?
|
|
|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Jan 19, 2007 20:40:04 GMT -6
Maybe he did not donate cuz he was not selling as many homes and therefore no money to donate.
This is pure speculation on my part....not based on any fact at all...
Maybe someone could ask Lehman why.....
|
|
|
|
Post by proschool on Jan 19, 2007 20:41:54 GMT -6
OK-whatever-PAC,SB the question still remains. Why would they pull their donation this time around when they have been so supportive in past referendums? Okay. Just how do you expect anyone here to know the answer to that question? Shouldn't you just email the Macom corporation. They have a website. |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Jan 19, 2007 20:41:58 GMT -6
OK-whatever-PAC,SB the question still remains. Why would they pull their donation this time around when they have been so supportive in past referendums? Are my posts not being posted? Because Macom's land was put in WVHS area. |
|
|
|
Post by blankcheck on Jan 19, 2007 20:42:35 GMT -6
Ashbury was not put into WVHS.
|
|
|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Jan 19, 2007 20:49:09 GMT -6
OK-whatever-PAC,SB the question still remains. Why would they pull their donation this time around when they have been so supportive in past referendums? Are my posts not being posted? Because Macom's land was put in WVHS area. Let's all play by the same rules bob...is that speculation on your part or did you get that from Macom? |
|
|
|
Post by bob on Jan 19, 2007 20:55:45 GMT -6
As I stated before that it is speculation based on fact that they supported every referendum until the last one. The only difference between 05's ref and 06's ref, 05 they supported 06 they didn't, is that their land went to WVHS in the 06 boundary determination.
|
|
