|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Jan 20, 2007 7:45:14 GMT -6
Any wine for me as long as it is cold.......
|
|
|
|
Post by title1parent on Jan 20, 2007 8:06:17 GMT -6
I like both......a red, Chianti with my Pasta and I just found an excellent Riesling, but I have to drive out to the boonies, Plano, to get it. Gatormom and her hubby make a wicked liqueur that will knock you on your a$$.
|
|
|
|
Post by warriorpride on Jan 20, 2007 8:52:42 GMT -6
Lacy/Macy have been hitting 2 nerves lately: 1) the I'm-going-to-keep-saying-that-people-on-this-board-are-slamming-certain-subdivisions-even-though-it's-not-true nerve 2) the I'm-going-to-keep-saying-that-the-Macom-site-is-clearly-a-better-choice-and-the-SB-doesn't-know-what-it's-doing nerve We've heard plenty of times that this is how you feel, loud and clear. You can keep repeating it, if you really want to (yes, it's a free country & you're entitled to your opinion), but it's not really necessary - we heard you the first 50 times. First off, I'm not lacy... do the research.. WHAT THE HECK? Why on earth other than the fact the names ryhme do you think I'm multiple posting? Can't the moderators prove this to not be true? If you can, please do it and soon, this is wrong. If I said "Warriorpride, your statements seem to mirror the same thought process as _____________. yOU ARE THE SAME PERSON DOUBLE POSTING!" It would be pure speculation. It's just bull, completely false and wrong to keep saying that we are the same. What have I ever said that makes you think I'm double posting? Is that what you do with all that disagree with you? Tag them all together. Give me a break. Prove it. You can't because it's not a reality. Not the same person. I've asked for this to stop in earlier posts. GO BACK AND READ... You do the research. You stated that I've made a false statement. I've read two (maybe more) postings from people that have called out TG/Pencross Knoll (remember the "Close enough" comment) on this board. How many other editorial authors have been called out on where they live? Really, please, I might have missed some, point them out to me. As far as me Macy stating the the Macom site is better? I did? Where, when??? Copy, paste and quote for me since I may not remember that quote. I don't remember definitively saying it's a better sitenthan BB. I have said I'm concerned about the ultimate outcome of the BB land in light of the fact that a 12 member jury will decide. My other concern is that I do not feel as if the SB, district has provided all they know on the Macom parcel. Stop the lies. I'm not lacy. It's not right. Moderators??? Can't you do anything about this? I seem to have hit a nerve - I never said that you were double-posting, but you seem to be very defensive about it - why is that? Edited to Add: oh, and how many times do I have to repeat that calling out a specific person is not a slam against a particular subdivision - if you can find a quote where someone slammed all of TG on this board, please point it out to us. |
|
|
|
Post by wvhsparent on Jan 20, 2007 9:10:49 GMT -6
Methinks this thread has reached it's end.......time to start new threads as info becomes available.
The Horse is dead............
|
|
